引用日本這篇不就自我證明了
＂為了相信政府與核工專家有陰謀（核能並非他們所說的安全），為了相信車諾比不止56人死亡；你必須證明全世界主要國際與學術機構，WHO，UN，IAEA等都在撒謊。＂1959年WHO與IAEA的協議，畢竟對於世界上初現核子武器，核能單位還是很新鮮的單位（1957 IAEA成立，需要訂立許多運作規範）
這項協議（agreements）也不是什麼見不得人的陰謀掩蓋，上IAEA都能查到
http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Docume ... nf20.shtml標題：
The Texts of the Agency´s Relationship Agreements with Specialized Agencies完全不是特別只有針對WHO要做掩飾，而是
IAEA與各國際單位所訂立的規章。
協議中有許多章節，分別訂立IAEA與下列不同單位的規範：
I. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
聯合國教育，科學，文化組織
II. International Labour Organisation 國際勞工組織
III. World Health Organization 世界衛生組織
III. World Meteorological Organization 世界氣象組織
IV. International Civil Aviation Organization 國際民航組織
V. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 聯合國農糧組織其中這篇文章指出的IAEA/WHO agreements主要位於III.
Article I – Co-operation and Consultation 合作與諮詢
1.The International Atomic Energy Agency and the World Health Organization agree that, with a view to facilitating the effective attainment of the objectives set forth in their respective constitutional instruments, within the general framework established by the Charter of the United Nations, they will act in close co-operation with each other and will consult each other regularly in regard to matters of common interest.
2.In particular, and in accordance with the Constitution of the World Health Organization and the Statute of the International Atomic Energy Agency and its agreement with the United Nations together with the exchange of letters related thereto, and taking into account the respective co-ordinating responsibilities of both organizations, it is recognized by the World Health Organization that the International Atomic Energy Agency has the primary responsibility for encouraging, assisting and co-ordinating research on, and development and practical application of, atomic energy for peaceful uses throughout the world
without prejudice to the right of the World Health Organization to concern itself with promoting, developing, assisting, and co-ordinating international health work, including research, in all its aspects.
3.Whenever either organization proposes to initiate a programme or activity on a subject in which the other organization has or may have a substantial interest, the first party shall consult the other with a view to adjusting the matter by mutual agreement.
有許多不知道是有意還是無意曲解文意的人士（包括您指的這篇），
片面解釋第3點（與台灣記者斷章取義功力很相似）
卻把1.2都忽略了。實際上3也沒有說IAEA能夠左右WHO，而是說互相諮詢；
而第二項的粗體字明訂了IAEA不能命令或者左右WHO違背世衛原本之職責。
WHO官方網站也有之反駁：
http://www.who.int/inf-pr-2001/en/state2001-世衛與IAEA原本就是獨立的個體。
就如同我前述的，
該協議是上述各單位互動的規章，而非只針對WHO做核災掩蓋的陰謀。（還是您又要認為其他單位也都牽涉全世界最大的騙局？）
所以您多慮了；也不用在一直認為全世界都有陰謀掩蓋核災恐怖了，
可能還是要檢討一下您的認知（either從情色作家得來的資訊）是否正確。
)
