防癌 安潔莉娜裘莉接受雙乳切除術

媒體怎樣報導醫界?醫界專業的觀點在哪裡? 歡迎論述,讓真相更完整的呈現!

版主: 版主021

回覆文章
onlight2000
Clerk
文章: 6
註冊時間: 週三 5月 15, 2013 4:01 pm

Re: 防癌 安潔莉娜裘莉接受雙乳切除術

文章 onlight2000 »

佩服她的勇氣,女權實踐者
接下來還可能會切除卵巢“I started with the breasts, as my risk of breast cancer is higher than my risk of ovarian cancer, and the surgery is more complex“
TC
指導教授
指導教授
文章: 9035
註冊時間: 週六 7月 08, 2006 9:27 pm

Re: 防癌 安潔莉娜裘莉接受雙乳切除術

文章 TC »

onlight2000 寫:佩服她的勇氣,女權實踐者
接下來還可能會切除卵巢“I started with the breasts, as my risk of breast cancer is higher than my risk of ovarian cancer, and the surgery is more complex“

讓我想到南韓整形悲劇"電風扇"阿姨...

裘莉該不會得到手術癖, 最後開到不成人形...
huangjauwen
V2
V2
文章: 2276
註冊時間: 週日 7月 31, 2011 9:20 pm
來自: 桃園

Re: 防癌 安潔莉娜裘莉接受雙乳切除術

文章 huangjauwen »

我有聽說 有人吃飯噎到死掉

所以...................




不用吃飯了
李誠民
註冊會員
註冊會員
文章: 1329
註冊時間: 週三 6月 23, 2010 10:18 am

Re: 防癌 安潔莉娜裘莉接受雙乳切除術

文章 李誠民 »

前兩期BMJ有文章報導乳癌早期發現(?)就做乳房切除,並植入整形乳房 (cosmetic breast implants),而近一兩天媒體報導---安捷莉那 潔莉,因乳癌基因篩檢,得知日後有乳癌的機率,是90%;;若做乳房預防性切除,乳癌的發生機率為小於5%;;........
Breast cancer detection and survival among women with cosmetic breast implants: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
BMJ 2013; 346 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f2399 (Published 30 April 2013)
Cite this as: BMJ 2013;346:f2399

Abstract
Objectives To evaluate whether the stage distribution among women diagnosed as having breast cancer differs between those who have received breast implants for cosmetic purposes and those with no implants and to evaluate whether cosmetic breast augmentation before the detection of breast cancer is a predictor of post-diagnosis survival.Design Systematic review of observational studies with two meta-analyses.
Data sources Systematic search of the literature published before September 2012 conducted in Medline, Embase, Global health, CINAHL, IPAB, and PsycINFO.
Study selection Eligible publications were those that included women diagnosed as having breast cancer and who had had augmentation mammaplasty for cosmetic purposes.
Results The overall odds ratio of the first meta-analysis based on 12 studies was 1.26 (95% confidence interval 0.99 to 1.60; P=0.058; I2=35.6%) for a non-localized stage of breast cancer at diagnosis comparing women with implants who had breast cancer and women without implants who had breast cancer. The second meta-analysis, based on five studies, evaluated the relation between cosmetic breast implantation and survival. This meta-analysis showed reduced survival after breast cancer among women who had implants compared with those who did not (overall hazard ratio for breast cancer specific mortality 1.38, 95% confidence interval 1.08 to 1.75).
Conclusions The research published to date suggests that cosmetic breast augmentation adversely affects the survival of women who are subsequently diagnosed as having breast cancer. These findings should be interpreted with caution, as some studies included in the meta-analysis on survival did not adjust for potential confounders. Further investigations are warranted regarding diagnosis and prognosis of breast cancer among women with breast implants.
如果換在台灣,Surgeon 要怎樣告訴您的病患?!
頭像
jesuischinoise
科主任級
科主任級
文章: 5958
註冊時間: 週三 8月 20, 2008 11:01 am

Re: 防癌 安潔莉娜裘莉接受雙乳切除術

文章 jesuischinoise »

Grey's anatomy就有演過類似劇情
常常喜樂 不住禱告 凡事謝恩

用認養取代買賣,可愛狗貓待認養:
http://right-pet.cc/wait_for.php

敬畏耶和華心存謙卑,就得富有,尊榮,生命為賞賜
頭像
jesuischinoise
科主任級
科主任級
文章: 5958
註冊時間: 週三 8月 20, 2008 11:01 am

Re: 防癌 安潔莉娜裘莉接受雙乳切除術

文章 jesuischinoise »

My chances of developing breast cancer have dropped from 87 percent to under 5 percent.

其實我很佩服她
不管是決定做這個手術
還是公開投書到報紙
都需要很強大的勇氣跟自信
常常喜樂 不住禱告 凡事謝恩

用認養取代買賣,可愛狗貓待認養:
http://right-pet.cc/wait_for.php

敬畏耶和華心存謙卑,就得富有,尊榮,生命為賞賜
頭像
k4210
V1
V1
文章: 1300
註冊時間: 週四 4月 29, 2010 10:43 pm

Re: 防癌 安潔莉娜裘莉接受雙乳切除術

文章 k4210 »

jesuischinoise 寫:
My chances of developing breast cancer have dropped from 87 percent to under 5 percent.

其實我很佩服她
不管是決定做這個手術
還是公開投書到報紙
都需要很強大的勇氣跟自信


+1,身為一線女明星,做出如此決定實在不簡單。
在深思熟慮後,自己要求外科醫師割除身上的不定時炸彈。

相反地,在太平洋對岸的某小島上,當外科醫師秉持專業,幫
某法官摘除了他身上的不定時炸彈後,卻吃上了官司。

兩相比較,對於「專業」的尊重,相差何止以道里計?
今日天晴,浪高。
皇國興廢,在此一戰,各員一層,奮力努力。
回覆文章

回到「★媒體報導VS醫界觀點」