社會主義者的問題,就是總把別人的錢花光
版主: 版主021
-
- CR
- 文章: 647
- 註冊時間: 週日 10月 18, 2009 2:37 pm
社會主義者的問題,就是總把別人的錢花光
愛恨鐵娘子
http://udn.com/NEWS/OPINION/X1/7836206.shtml
引述最末段2句:民眾都想繳少領多,但遲早得有人埋單。「社會主義者的問題,就是總把別人的錢花光」。
雖然這篇文章不是在談健保,但是最末段卻讓我有感而發。快5月了,要被剝層皮了,民眾多少會對高稅率的人抱持"**"的心理。藉此文抒發感慨。
http://udn.com/NEWS/OPINION/X1/7836206.shtml
引述最末段2句:民眾都想繳少領多,但遲早得有人埋單。「社會主義者的問題,就是總把別人的錢花光」。
雖然這篇文章不是在談健保,但是最末段卻讓我有感而發。快5月了,要被剝層皮了,民眾多少會對高稅率的人抱持"**"的心理。藉此文抒發感慨。
- Necropsy
- V2
- 文章: 2722
- 註冊時間: 週四 7月 16, 2009 9:03 pm
Re: 社會主義者的問題,就是總把別人的錢花光
沒有鬼神,沒有命運
只有努力&機率
努力可以改變機率
如果有神,那就是COVID-19
只有努力&機率
努力可以改變機率
如果有神,那就是COVID-19
- rich
- V2
- 文章: 2137
- 註冊時間: 週三 8月 30, 2006 11:24 am
- 來自: Tainan
-
- 註冊會員
- 文章: 1622
- 註冊時間: 週三 12月 14, 2011 1:33 pm
Re: 社會主義者的問題,就是總把別人的錢花光
社會主義的根本問題其實是:不努力工作的人總是努力把努力工作人的錢花光。
在(還沒有實施社會主義其實已經是準社會主義的)台灣,這些不努力工作的,包括很多國營事業和政府機關。這才是真正可怕之處。不努力工作,卻握有權柄,懂得制定法律箝制努力工作人的盈餘走向,更是可怕中的可怕。
隨便舉兩個例子:鬼叫很多年,號稱要改革的軍公教退休制度,改革了甚麼?教師課稅?結果呢?
在(還沒有實施社會主義其實已經是準社會主義的)台灣,這些不努力工作的,包括很多國營事業和政府機關。這才是真正可怕之處。不努力工作,卻握有權柄,懂得制定法律箝制努力工作人的盈餘走向,更是可怕中的可怕。
隨便舉兩個例子:鬼叫很多年,號稱要改革的軍公教退休制度,改革了甚麼?教師課稅?結果呢?
-
- 榮譽院長級
- 文章: 43450
- 註冊時間: 週四 3月 26, 2009 8:10 pm
- 來自: 集合住宅
Re: 社會主義者的問題,就是總把別人的錢花光
社會主義者的問題,就是總把別人的錢花光
不過 如果強迫富人當"別人" ~倒也還可以接受
(就怕叫薪水階級當"別人" 像台灣 )
- leonhong
- V4
- 文章: 4839
- 註冊時間: 週三 8月 27, 2008 1:55 pm
- 來自: 貓國
-
- 院長級
- 文章: 19123
- 註冊時間: 週一 11月 20, 2006 5:19 pm
- 來自: 歡婆鄉
Re: 社會主義者的問題,就是總把別人的錢花光
反撒切爾人士聚會歡慶「鐵娘子」去世
http://www.bbc.co.uk/ukchina/trad/uk_li ... ties.shtml
http://www.bbc.co.uk/ukchina/trad/uk_li ... ties.shtml
台灣是個寶島
-
- 註冊會員
- 文章: 1329
- 註冊時間: 週三 6月 23, 2010 10:18 am
Re: 社會主義者的問題,就是總把別人的錢花光
Thatcher’s legacy
BMJ 2013; 346 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f2382 (Published 15 April 2013)
Cite this as: BMJ 2013;346:f2
[color=#FF4080]Rats on the streets during the bin collectors’ strike, the Green Goddesses, wildcat 不可靠strikes, flying pickets, the closed shop, block votes, “one out all out,” restrictive work practices, double digit inflation, a three day week, and a winter of discontent不滿. The 1970s in Britain were a time of national crisis, with undemocratic and out of control trade unions[/color].
The Conservatives won the 1979 election: working class people had voted for change. The Thatcher government crushed the unions’ power, but the price was broken communities, public disorder, and mass unemployment. The industrialised north and Scotland paid the heaviest price, while the south east and London experienced economic renewal. Margaret Thatcher was a saviour to some, a political savage to others; this was her divisive legacy. Thatcherism set off a cascade of consequences: the current deregulation of the NHS is simply her unfinished free market business.
There is another Thatcherite legacy—worklessness. During the 1980s and 1990s, unskilled middle aged men were haemorrhaged from heavy industry, with no hope of work in the new service based economy. So general practitioners were encouraged to redefine the unemployed as “sick” to get the unemployment figures down. We colluded, because this meant some improvement in meagre貧乏 benefits for patients. So this worklessness doubled between 1985 and 1995, to more than two and a half million people, but varied hugely by region. Today in areas of Glasgow, 17% of the working age population is deemed too sick to work, eight times more than in Hampshire.1 (These figures do not include people officially deemed unemployed.) This huge difference can be explained only as a social phenomenon; it cannot reflect true variation in disease or disability.
Worklessness is a modern medical scourge嚴逞 災禍. With 1.8 million children living in workless households,2 it is associated with poor child development and schooling, behavioural issues, unhappiness, and increased risk of being a NEET (“not in education, employment, or training”) at age 18.3 For adults, worklessness is bound to poverty and premature death.4 It is worklessness that has created the chasm of inequality, leaving millions of children in poverty. These are society’s new precariat, and society’s elite are unwilling or unable to tackle this pernicious sickness. But welfare reform must happen, whatever the lobbying, protests, and conflict.
Welfare reform is not about paying down the national debt but about saving the mental and physical welfare of millions of marginalised people. And today there is a public consensus for change.5 We must break the cycle of worklessness. This will take Thatcherite conviction, steely leadership to see it through, a willingness to be disliked, and even historically to be considered divisive. Worklessness and welfare are a national crisis, and reform must not be for turning.
Notes
Cite this as: BMJ 2013;346:f2382
賒契爾夫人是鐵娘子,但真的是反社會主義嗎?!
將國營企業改為資本主義的自由市場就是改革嗎?!
社會主義下的公營事業是有強烈的社會責任,硬是改變就是民主嗎?!
至少英國的醫療制度(NHS)是失敗的!!!
台灣的健保制度是更可怕的---獨裁法西斯思想的制度???
台灣領導者只要"不沾鍋",就沒責任??!可能嗎?!!!
核能是高知識的思慮,牽涉國家能源政策,但核四(爛攤子!!!),卻可公投!一般民眾有這能力嗎!
健保不教育人民,卻模糊焦點的改革(要價黑洞? 轉診制度? 健保收費(健保稅)?..........,台灣才是希臘第二---國債直追希臘........!!!
BMJ 2013; 346 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f2382 (Published 15 April 2013)
Cite this as: BMJ 2013;346:f2
[color=#FF4080]Rats on the streets during the bin collectors’ strike, the Green Goddesses, wildcat 不可靠strikes, flying pickets, the closed shop, block votes, “one out all out,” restrictive work practices, double digit inflation, a three day week, and a winter of discontent不滿. The 1970s in Britain were a time of national crisis, with undemocratic and out of control trade unions[/color].
The Conservatives won the 1979 election: working class people had voted for change. The Thatcher government crushed the unions’ power, but the price was broken communities, public disorder, and mass unemployment. The industrialised north and Scotland paid the heaviest price, while the south east and London experienced economic renewal. Margaret Thatcher was a saviour to some, a political savage to others; this was her divisive legacy. Thatcherism set off a cascade of consequences: the current deregulation of the NHS is simply her unfinished free market business.
There is another Thatcherite legacy—worklessness. During the 1980s and 1990s, unskilled middle aged men were haemorrhaged from heavy industry, with no hope of work in the new service based economy. So general practitioners were encouraged to redefine the unemployed as “sick” to get the unemployment figures down. We colluded, because this meant some improvement in meagre貧乏 benefits for patients. So this worklessness doubled between 1985 and 1995, to more than two and a half million people, but varied hugely by region. Today in areas of Glasgow, 17% of the working age population is deemed too sick to work, eight times more than in Hampshire.1 (These figures do not include people officially deemed unemployed.) This huge difference can be explained only as a social phenomenon; it cannot reflect true variation in disease or disability.
Worklessness is a modern medical scourge嚴逞 災禍. With 1.8 million children living in workless households,2 it is associated with poor child development and schooling, behavioural issues, unhappiness, and increased risk of being a NEET (“not in education, employment, or training”) at age 18.3 For adults, worklessness is bound to poverty and premature death.4 It is worklessness that has created the chasm of inequality, leaving millions of children in poverty. These are society’s new precariat, and society’s elite are unwilling or unable to tackle this pernicious sickness. But welfare reform must happen, whatever the lobbying, protests, and conflict.
Welfare reform is not about paying down the national debt but about saving the mental and physical welfare of millions of marginalised people. And today there is a public consensus for change.5 We must break the cycle of worklessness. This will take Thatcherite conviction, steely leadership to see it through, a willingness to be disliked, and even historically to be considered divisive. Worklessness and welfare are a national crisis, and reform must not be for turning.
Notes
Cite this as: BMJ 2013;346:f2382
賒契爾夫人是鐵娘子,但真的是反社會主義嗎?!
將國營企業改為資本主義的自由市場就是改革嗎?!
社會主義下的公營事業是有強烈的社會責任,硬是改變就是民主嗎?!
至少英國的醫療制度(NHS)是失敗的!!!
台灣的健保制度是更可怕的---獨裁法西斯思想的制度???
台灣領導者只要"不沾鍋",就沒責任??!可能嗎?!!!
核能是高知識的思慮,牽涉國家能源政策,但核四(爛攤子!!!),卻可公投!一般民眾有這能力嗎!
健保不教育人民,卻模糊焦點的改革(要價黑洞? 轉診制度? 健保收費(健保稅)?..........,台灣才是希臘第二---國債直追希臘........!!!
-
- 院長級
- 文章: 17637
- 註冊時間: 週五 6月 23, 2006 6:18 pm
- 來自: 黑心島國
Re: 社會主義者的問題,就是總把別人的錢花光
可不可以請立委質詢一下 : 台灣的健保國債是不是永遠要讓醫護人員來扛 !?
-
- R4
- 文章: 439
- 註冊時間: 週二 4月 14, 2009 5:49 pm
Re: 社會主義者的問題,就是總把別人的錢花光
人類的道德水準畢竟還沒到達可以實施社會主義或共產主義的境界
- newshine
- 榮譽院長級
- 文章: 36303
- 註冊時間: 週五 5月 14, 2010 10:52 am
Re: 社會主義者的問題,就是總把別人的錢花光
auricle 寫:可不可以請立委質詢一下 : 台灣的健保國債是不是永遠要讓醫護人員來扛 !?
官員回答說
應該不是
因為不只健保國債
可能其它的國債
也會順便轉移過來
- Necropsy
- V2
- 文章: 2722
- 註冊時間: 週四 7月 16, 2009 9:03 pm
Re: 社會主義者的問題,就是總把別人的錢花光
病人: 如果健保可以給付,可以開的藥或檢查,請醫師儘量幫忙,反正那是健保的錢
醫師: 這健保有給付,可以開的藥或檢查,我儘量幫你,反正那是健保的錢
所以最後..........
醫師: 這健保有給付,可以開的藥或檢查,我儘量幫你,反正那是健保的錢
所以最後..........
沒有鬼神,沒有命運
只有努力&機率
努力可以改變機率
如果有神,那就是COVID-19
只有努力&機率
努力可以改變機率
如果有神,那就是COVID-19
- Einstein
- 科主任級
- 文章: 5422
- 註冊時間: 週五 3月 22, 2013 7:37 pm
Re: 社會主義者的問題,就是總把別人的錢花光
社會主義者的問題,就是總把別人的錢花光
不只如此,還污衊你貪了他的錢!就像XX菊一樣。
不只如此,還污衊你貪了他的錢!就像XX菊一樣。